Jeff Probst wrote:
Helen, you were an incredibly dominant force in this game. From day 1 on Helios you proved to be very involved and incredibly methodical. Do you think that your quirky way of overanalyzing everything time and time again hurt you in the game or helped you make it to the final 3 and potentially win? Obviously it didn't affect you too much, lol, but maybe it did separate you from some of the players because you were at jeopardy a lot of times towards the end.
As players have the opportunity to go through my confessional later, they'll potentially see (in addition to how godawfully verbose I am) how detailed I went into analyzing positions and strategies and the likelihoods of different outcomes.
I think both of your observations are spot-on. My OCD analytical "quirks" were certainly an asset to me working out strategies to get to the end, but also, preparing for and eventually winning the final four ICs. But my "quirks" certainly weren't a secret from anyone that had discussions with me, so that's absolutely a reason why it was wise of them to put a bullseye on my head.