Erin wrote:
Helen's question:
Helen, you challenge beast, if you had to, tell me why Brian shouldn’t win this game? You’ve made convincing arguments against Penny but turn on Brian now.
Hi Erin! Sorry that you can't be sitting here with us
Brian shouldn't win the game because he didn't have the connections with players to make the plans work, and he wasn't as active in coming up with the plans that were implemented. He even admitted earlier in tribal council that he knew my strategic knowhow and approach was something that he wouldn't be able to parallel or outperform.
Brian relied on my communications with Rob when he mutinied, as he said that I was instrumental in getting plan to work with Rob and Asteria to win the F11 IC and identify their target at F10. Brian relied on my communications with Ted when we rejoined him at the merge, as we needed him as a vote on our side, and he was. Brian relied on my communications with Asteria both when working with them and when working against them. Although we agreed on this plans, Brian didn't have the personal relationships to turn those plans into a reality. And even when I continued to talk to the other members of Asteria, he admitted that he had ceased communications with them almost entirely.
For someone who worked with me so closely to plan out each piece of the game, he wouldn't have been capable to make each of those things happen without me. And because he was dependent on me to execute those strategies and get to the end since he appeared not capable of being able to do it alone, he shouldn't win this game.
Erin wrote:
Also, if you had to compare your gameplay to a Survivor contestant, who would it be?
Going into this game, I wouldn't have expected my strategy to play like this at all, so I'd never have anticipated relating my gameplay to this contestant, but my answer is Tom Westman. And if you're scoffing at that, let me explain why.
Pre-merge, Tom was identified as the leader of the Koror tribe, much in the manner that you even specifically turned to me once and called me our challenge leader. And because of stepping up to keep the tribe competitive and in a good position, he was a potential target at the merge.
Post-merge, in spite of being a threat down the road, he kept himself in a pivotal position in the alliances so that he couldn't be expendable. He had Ian and Katie as a majority over Gregg and Jenn. If the Helios "5" went to the end, we needed Ted there so that he would be on our side instead letting you and Penny take control or tie it up.
Strategically, when he expected Gregg and Jenn had successfully recruited Katie to join them at F5, he alluded to game theory saying that he needed to strike them first before they had the chance to strike him, which is why he reverted on his word and took out Gregg at F6. This same theory applied here for eliminating Daniel (who could've joined with you/Penny) and Ted (who could've joined with Asteria, if he changed his mind).
Physically, that reason is probably evident enough as it is. Tom was targeted post-merge not because he put himself in an inoperable strategic position, but because people identified him as a threat to win a jury vote. Regardless of whether or not I even so much as stand a chance of winning today, people identified me at F7 as deserving and threatening to win, and that's why immunity has come as a comfort to avoid the bullseye of being a potential threat in the final, regardless of whether it actually rings true.