Hey, guys! Gj at being the final three. I'm not going to say anything more, because noone wants to hear the same things over and over again about how deserving the three of you are. I'd rather keep this relatively short, so here we go.

Brian

I don't have anything to say to you. By the time this question comes around you probably already explained your game. My question is to you: did you really think you could beat Helen? Because you didn't show an ounce of willingness to vote her out at any point in this game. Do you think there's any way you could differentiate yourself from Helen? For me the two of were... Helen and her shadow.


Penny

hey, girl! Emotionally, I'm the happiest for you. I feel like you underestimated yourself, and you're not a goat by any means. But to be honest, I have hard time seeing myself voting for you over Helen. So my task for you is simple: Tell my why the game Helen played is shit. Tell me how bad it was. And be genuine. I don't want you to tell me that it was 'good'. I want to see nasty-Penny.


Helen

80% of me wants to vote for you, while the other 20% wants to vote for Penny. I think you played the best game here, hands down. But to be honest, I think that after the first few merge rounds you set yourself up for a fall. Everyone knew you were a threat, and I think that the biggest reason you're there is because of your immunityrun. I usually think that a great player doesn't need immunity. So, here's my task for you: give me a possible rundown on events, assuming you never won immunity (and assuming that the winner of the immunity-challenge was always safe and that it never played part i who's going home). Got it?

Here's the catch though. We all know how much do you like writing, and since your opening speech was long enough, I want you to answer my question in less than... say eighty words.

Good luck guys ^_^

if Joanna is in the final three, by any mistake... I'll quickly whip something up for her

*two of you were... Helen and her shadow.

And alol so much at the 80 word limit for Helen

confessional: I never proofread anything.

I'll correct it. I have to do it anyway, because I may change my questions based on their openings.

Hey, guys! Gj at being the final three. I'm not going to say anything more, because noone wants to hear the same things over and over again about how deserving the three of you are. I'd rather keep this relatively short, so here we go.

Brian

Your opening speech was basically describing how you willingly rode coattails. If you want my vote tell me why you deserve it more over Helen. That's it.

Penny

hey, girl! Actually I've rewritten my entire question after your opening. Before it, I was 80-20 about voting for you (you with 20, Helen with 80), but I'd say I'm fifty-fifty right now. My question is: was there any point in this game when you seriously considered voting out Helen over anyone had she not won immunity? Thanks, and good luck


Helen

Great game, great opening full of bullshitting. Here's my concern: I think that after the first few merge rounds you set yourself up for a fall. Everyone knew you were a threat, and I think that the biggest reason you're there is because of your immunityrun. I think that a great player doesn't need immunity, eventhough it's part of the game. So, here's my task for you: give me a possible rundown on events, assuming you never won immunity (and assuming that the winner of the immunity-challenge was always safe and that it never played part in who's going home). Got it?

Here's the catch though. We all know how much do you like writing, and since your opening speech was long enough, I want you to answer my question in less than... say, 80-110 words. Have fun!

Good luck guys ^_^

]Hey, guys! Gj at being the final three. I'm not going to say anything more, because noone wants to hear the same things over and over again about how deserving the three of you are. I'd rather keep this relatively short, so here we go.

Brian

In your opening speech you basically described how you willingly rode coattails. If you want my vote tell me why you deserve it more over Helen. That's it.

Penny

hey, girl! Actually I've rewritten my entire question after your opening. Before it, I was 80-20 about voting for you (you with 20, Helen with 80), but I'd say I'm fifty-fifty right now. My question is: was there any point in this game when you seriously considered voting out Helen over anyone had she not won immunity? Thanks, and good luck


Helen

Great game, great opening full of bullshitting. Here's my concern: I think that after the first few merge rounds you set yourself up for a fall. Everyone knew you were a threat, and I think that the biggest reason you're there is because of your immunityrun. I think that a great player doesn't need immunity, eventhough it's part of the game. So, here's my task for you: give me a possible rundown on events, assuming you never won immunity (and assuming that the winner of the immunity-challenge was always safe and that it never played part in who's going home). Got it?

Here's the catch though. We all know how much do you like writing, and since your opening speech was long enough, I want you to answer my question in less than... say, 110 words. Have fun!

Good luck guys ^_^

She gets an extra 30 words? how generous