Not too much to say about
Helios compared to Asteria's write-up yet, only that they are different as the Sun and the Stars indeed. The bonding on the beach compared to Asteria's barren forum is ridiculously apt. Asteria is all about mostly negative players with a pinch of positive. Total 180 for Helios - the likes of
Erin, Jake & Jan in particular seem truly can-do attitudes in motion,
Penny's bubblyness is part-front to hide her schemey side but I like that in a player (BrendAus
).
Ted I guess is the only real negative persona I guess?
Ted on the public beach wrote:
We're going to dominate them if we don't take any clues, guys!
Ted in the privacy of his confessional wrote:
I still have some amount of confidence, but I do hate my tribe.
Am I allowed to ask for the second clue now, or do I have to wait for 30 minutes before the challenge?
**
Neither
Brian nor
Helen are particularly outgoing and happy-spa-ish, but they're not overly negative either. They are the only real two engaging in strategy talk yet (with each other ofc). Penny is trying a little with these two at least, but her I'm-too-blonde-to-be-a-threat facade is kinda holding her back from getting meaty with with either. By the time Helios have to face their first TC, these will be a solid trio, with outliers of Erin, and maybe Jake?
Not all is hunky-dory on Helios beach though, there is a little bitterness over two players grabbing the idol clue (Ted & Penny, and they're both planning to get the second as soon as poss by the looks of it). Nobody is certain who did it, and nobody wants to kick up a fuss or point fingers publicly, so they're left to bitch in their confessionals.
Working from gut feelings, Ken is correct in thinking it's Ted plus another. Ted thinks Ken might be the second grabber. Erin is annoyed but trying not to dwell on it. Jake reckons Ken & Penny.
Working from the online times & lists, Helen thinks it's Jake & Ted (or perhaps Brian), and Brian thinks it's Helen (plus Ted :D
This hopefully might end up with all hell breaking loose if they have more than one grab the clue today
What might dampen potential fireworks before they can go off is if Helen's plan to foil the Prisoner's Dilemma works well with the rest of the tribe;
Helen PM to Brian (The 'Her' mentioned is Penny) wrote:
I don't even know what the friending functionality is, so I'm gonna say that's a "no" haha
So, for starters, I didn't take the clue last round and don't really have any guesses as to who did. But, I am certainly curious (one, since it's a clue; two, since whoever has already or will eventually get the idol could be an asset to the tribe down the line).
Clearly, it's in the tribe's best interests for no one to take the clue. But, it's in individual's best interests to take the clue. But if everyone agrees not to take it, and everyone's being honest, we have nothing to worry about.
The issue? We don't live in a perfect world, and Prisoner's Dilemmas are generally effective. So, how can we outsmart the twist?
What if, as a tribe, we delegate someone who we find to be the most trustworthy. We'll agree to have that person, and only that person, request the clue, and then they'll share it with everyone else. This way, we'll still likely have an advantage over the other tribe (since we'll only have one clue-taker, and no one else has incentive to take it anyways) AND we don't have to worry about people selling out.
The optimal strategy is for no one to take the clue, but it comes down to, do you believe everyone else?
Thoughts?
Also, when I mentioned this to her, she thought about sharing the idea with everyone else, and I asked her if we needed to share the idea with one other person before going private, who would it be, and she suggested you, so I think she's just as down for a three-person alliance as we are. But before tomorrow, we'll probably want to work on getting more numbers and do voting discussions.
This could be very effective, but a lot depends on when and how they present this idea to the tribe..